Re: [ecasound] Mixing operator

From: Krzysztof Foltman <wdev@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Mar 31 2009 - 11:44:31 EEST

Kai Vehmanen wrote:

> - chroute: Routing is probably way too overloaded term, but probably
> - charrange: This seems pretty good, as the operator allows one
> - chorder: Like arrange, this is fairly descriptive, but not
> - chmux (or chmultiplex): The output usually contains multiple
> - chmatrix: This is what the implementation essentially is,
> - chtransform: Same as for 'chmatrix', too scary.
> - chset: Create a new set of channels. Hmm, not sure about this one.

What about those:

-chpick (picks the input channels to use for output)
-cherrypick (okay, this is lame)
-chshuffle (like in an SSE instruction shufps)
-chmap (map of input channels to output channels, except specified in
reverse direction)

I'm fine with some of the remaining ones too (chorder, charrange, chmux,
chselect). The -chmatrix implies something else, a generic MxN mixing
matrix. The -chtransform might indeed be too scary and vague.


Ecasound-list mailing list
Received on Tue Mar 31 12:15:05 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 31 2009 - 12:15:06 EEST