Subject: Re: [ecasound] Re: ecasound latency (fwd)
From: Kai Vehmanen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 02:37:03 EET
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:
>> In this case, number of tracks doesn't affect latency. Basicly,
> so this is an improvement on ecasound5?
Well, actually no. This has been the case ever since I added support
for multiple chains. If there are no realtime device in the
chainsetup, only then the number of tracks starts to slow things down.
-- Kai Vehmanen <email@example.com> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux multitrack audio processing . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Fri Jan 21 2000 - 09:57:29 EET