Subject: Re: [ecasound] using mpg123 and lame
From: Jeremy Hall (firstname.lastname@example.org )
Date: Fri Dec 17 1999 - 14:19:14 EET
well I since have found .59r and things got a LOT better.
Later versions of lame are improving both speed and efficiency, so you
might want to look at the newer versions.
Kai Vehmanen said:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> > Version 0.59o (1998/Feb/08). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
> > and it does not like live streams produced by lame. Since you people want
> > to use mpg123 and lame in combination with ecasound, have you seen
> > problems with this combination? Lame is 3.57
> Hmm, I'm using mpg123 0.59r and lame 3.12 with no problems. What
> you mean by 'doesn't like'? Errors, distortion, ...?
> Kai Vehmanen <email@example.com> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux audio processing
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon Dec 27 1999 - 15:50:38 EET